From the Archive:
Regulatory Intelligence
Is closure planning only about abandoning individual wells?
Category:
Well Abandonment
Research Basis
Archive Period
2017-2022
Records Reviewed
6
Primary Topics
Directive 020; Well Abandonment; Non-Routine Abandonment; Variance Requests; Zonal Abandonment; Closure Programs
Current Reference
AER Directive 020
Common Question
Is closure planning only about abandoning individual wells?
Archive Findings
No. The archive indicates that closure planning extended well beyond deciding which individual wells to abandon. Historical correspondence describes closure as a broader compliance and planning framework involving Area Based Closure participation, mandatory and voluntary spend pathways, OneStop reporting, DDS reporting where appropriate, surface equipment removal timing, and differences between well risk categories. The records also show why these program-level decisions mattered. Enrolling in Area Based Closure could provide flexibility in where closure dollars were spent, allowing operators to focus on completing closure in an area rather than spreading work across several areas. The correspondence also discusses situations where certain medium-risk wells may have reduced downhole work or pressure-testing implications depending on the applicable closure pathway and risk type. The archive therefore supports a broader interpretation of closure work: it is not only a field abandonment program, but also a regulatory planning, reporting, spending, and prioritization exercise.
.png)
Need help with an application?
Our team can help you navigate regulatory requirements, prepare strong applications and avoid costly delays
587.880.2249
Engineering Insight
The engineering and regulatory lesson is that closure planning should be integrated early. Operators may focus on the physical abandonment work, but the archive shows that program selection, spend commitments, reporting obligations, and well risk categories can influence both compliance strategy and field execution. For engineers and regulatory staff, this means closure decisions should not be made well-by-well in isolation. The better approach is to consider abandonment requirements, closure spend obligations, area strategy, reporting systems, and surface abandonment requirements together.
Current Guidance
Current abandonment requirements should be reviewed against AER Directive 020. Current closure spend, Area Based Closure, OneStop reporting, and liability management requirements should be confirmed against the current AER closure and liability management framework applicable at the time of planning.
Related Regulatory Insights
Historical newsletter insights that reference the same directive, manual, rule or regulatory requirement.
Apr 30, 2025
Benoit+ WellFile and Key 2025 Directive Updates
This issue introduces Benoit+ WellFile and summarizes regulatory updates involving Directive 040, Directive 060, Directive 039, Directive 020, pilot-technology guidance, shallow-rights reversion, Saskatchewan orphan matters, and BC EIMS items.
Apr 30, 2022
AER Fees, Orphan Fund Levy and Cryptocurrency Mining Information Requests
This issue covers AER administration fees, orphan fund levy updates, phishing-awareness information, mineral-development sessions, cryptocurrency mining information requests, Directive 020, and Saskatchewan orphan levy and PNG017 updates.